Estate Agents – The Simple Mistake That Cost A 10% Commission

March 7, 2017 Kapp Van Wyk Van Zyl Inc


There’s many a slip ‘twixt the cup and the lip” (very wise old proverb)

A recent Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) case shows yet again how essential it is to double-check that your Fidelity Fund Certificate (FFC) is both current and valid. Remember that you must hold FFCs not only for your trading entity (if you operate through one) but also for all directors/members/principals and agents.

The Estate Agency Affairs Act disentitles you to any remuneration if you don’t hold a valid FFC. Don’t drop the ball on that one!

A fatal oversight

The facts in the SCA case were these –

  • An estate agency company converted to a close corporation but forgot to advise the Estate Agency Affairs Board of the conversion.
  • The agency had no valid FFC at all when it was supposedly granted a mandate (the existence of a mandate was in dispute) by three companies to sell their interests in a mining operation (comprising an immovable property, mining permits, and inter-company shareholdings).
  • By the time the agency fulfilled this supposed mandate by introducing a buyer, it had acquired FFCs – but they were in the names of the non-existent company and the ex-director. The CC and its member held no FFCs.
  • The seller refused to pay the claimed 10% commission and raised several defences, including an assertion that the close corporation had no FFC and was thus not entitled to any remuneration.On appeal, the SCA overruled the High Court’s finding that the agency had “substantially complied” with the Act’s requirements in regard to the FFCs. “This is not”, said the SCA, “simply an issue of nomenclature, or a misdescription in the name of the certificate holder, but one of substance. The objectives of the Act are not fulfilled by the issue of invalid certificates by the Board as they play a central role in ensuring that estate agents comply with its provisions.”The FFCs, held the Court, were accordingly invalid, and the estate agency was not entitled to any remuneration.

In this particular case the agency had in any case failed on the facts to prove its mandate, but the warning to all estate agents is clear – holding valid FFCs is a necessity, not a technicality.

The post Estate Agents – The Simple Mistake That Cost A 10% Commission appeared first on KVV Inc..


Previous Article
Your Property Sale Agreement: Be Careful How It’s Worded!
Your Property Sale Agreement: Be Careful How It’s Worded!

“In war and litigation, both sides suffer” (old Roman proverb) Here’s yet another reminder from our courts ...

Next Article
How to Freeze Your Dodging Debtor’s Assets
How to Freeze Your Dodging Debtor’s Assets

“Pyrrhic victory”, n. A victory gained at such great cost that it is actually a defeat Joe Debtor owes you ...


Get the latest in Property Law straight to your inbox!

First Name
Last Name
Welcome to our Blog!
Error - something went wrong!